Mendez v. Westminster Court Ruling The judgment below is. 0000067670 00000 n This appeal followed. In a 5-4 opinion written by Justice Louis Powell, the Court held that the trial court erred when it failed to consider mitigating evidence of Eddings unhappy childhood and emotional disturbance. 0000071802 00000 n The U.S. Supreme Court was clear in its verbiage that a major part of education is the discussion and "comingling" of intellectual abilities. The judgment below is reversed, p. 642. The proceedings below are stated in the opinion. 339 U. S. 640-641. WebMcLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents is a case that was decided on June 5, 1950, by the United States Supreme Court holding that a state cannot treat a student differently on the basis of race. Dist. Ann. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents | Definition & Facts WebMcLaurin v. Okla. State Regents for Higher Educ. HM0O0wz,['+hQ#H pt}~es9p~(/W3&5YfqL4Q7F:6[QcsWP\~)gLBsDhjB`9L[{kNu2[/(DSm:o_zX?aEEn^)}UXR}2 wF%. Learn about the court case of McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents with a summary and case brief. In the McLaurin case, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the University of Oklahoma had violated the equal protection clause because the experience needed for a good education could not be accomplished by physically separating McLaurin. The Justices acknowledged in their ruling that it is impossible to have a "separate yet equal" education because of the nature of education itself. Mr. Fred Hansen, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellees. Pursuant to a requirement of state law that the instruction of Negroes in institutions of higher education be "upon a segregated basis," however, he was assigned to a seat in the classroom in a row specified for Negro students, was assigned to a special table in the library, and, although permitted to eat in the cafeteria at the same time as other students, was assigned to a special table there. No. The amendment provided, however, that in such cases the program of instruction 'shall be given at such colleges or institutions of higher education upon a segregated basis. WebIn 1948, George McLaurin applied to the University of Oklahoma's master's degree program in education. [1], Chief Justice Frederick Vinson, writing for the court, argued that the actions of the University of Oklahoma violated the student's constitutional right to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. For the first time, the U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged that the fabric of American society was changing. Further, the Court ruled that "discrimination had no place in education." 526; 1948 U.S. Sweatt v. Painter The case McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents began when the University of Oklahoma denied George McLaurin into its graduate program because of his race. - Biography, Facts, Quotes & Accomplishments, Working Scholars Bringing Tuition-Free College to the Community. A three-judge federal trial court determined that officials in Oklahoma had a constitutional duty to provide the plaintiff with the education he wanted as soon as they offered the same to students of any other race. McLaurin had to sit at a separate table in classrooms, the library, and the cafeteria. It is said that the separations imposed by the State in this case are in form merely nominal. Marian W. Perry and Franklin H. Williams were also of counsel. With him on the brief was Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General. Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337 (1938), and Sipuel v. Board of Regents, 332 U.S. 631 (1948), a statutory three-judge District Court held that the State had a Constitutional duty to provide him with the education he sought as soon as it provided that education for applicants of any other group. Since McLauren did not have access to this aspect of his education, he was being denied an equal education to that of his peers. We hold that under these circumstances the Fourteenth Amendment precludes differences in treatment by the state based upon race. It is said that the separations imposed by the State in this case are in form merely nominal. Pursuant to a requirement of state law that the instruction of Negroes in institutions of higher education be "upon a segregated basis," however, he was assigned to a seat in the classroom in a row specified for Negro students, was assigned to a special table in the library, and, although permitted to eat in the cafeteria at the same time as other students, was assigned to a special table there. Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, Will v. Michigan Department of State Police, Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community, Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education, Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, Northeastern Fla. Chapter, Associated Gen. Oklahoma Historical Society800 Nazih Zuhdi Drive, Oklahoma City, OK 73105 | 405-521-2491Site Index | Contact Us | Privacy | Press Room | Website Inquiries, Get Updates in Your Inbox Keep up to date with our weekly newsletter delivered straight to your inbox. 638-642. The following (as per The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th edition) is the preferred citation for articles:Alfred L. Brophy, McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950), The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture, https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry.php?entry=MC034. The result is that appellant is handicapped in his pursuit of effective graduate instruction. Robert L. Carter and Amos T. Hall argued the cause for appellant. McLaurin v. Oklahoma ( 1950) | History 404: US Constitution With them on the brief were Thurgood Marshall and Frank D. Reeves. This page was last edited on 18 March 2023, at 15:55. African American History: Research Guides & Websites, Global African History: Research Guides & Websites, African American Scientists and Technicians of the Manhattan Project, Envoys, Diplomatic Ministers, & Ambassadors, Foundation, Organization, and Corporate Supporters. The University admitted McLaurin but provided him separate facilities, including a special table in the cafeteria, a designated desk in the library, a desk just outside the classroom doorway, and sometimes even made him eat at different times than the other students. In this ruling and its companion case, Sweatt v. Painter, decided on the same day, the Supreme Court held that African American students must receive the same treatment as all other students in the realm of higher education. US Supreme Court. Pp. His application was rejected because state law prohibited black [2], Oral argument was held between April 3, 1950, and April 4, 1950. Stateimposed restrictions which produce such inequalities cannot be sustained. 526 (W.D. %PDF-1.4 % He may wait in line in the cafeteria and there stand and talk with his fellow students, but while he eats he must remain apart. 87 F. Supp. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950), was a United States Supreme Court case that prohibited racial segregation in state supported graduate or professional education. 526 (W. D. Okla. 1949). Oklahoma State Regents . Ann. In 1948, McLaurin applied for admission to the doctoral program in the College of Education, directly challenging the states current segregation laws. 848.